MS-102 Question 187

Community Discussion

Written by other learners. Comments can disagree with the marked answer — check the official documentation when in doubt.

• 1

  YNN Statement 1 After you create the suppression rule, Alert1 is visible in the alerts queue. Alert1 already existed before the rule was created. Suppression rules do not retroactively hide existing alerts. ✅ Yes Statement 2 After you create the suppression rule, Alert3 is visible in the alerts queue. Alert3 already existed before the rule was created. Also, Device3 belongs to ATP2, outside the scope. ✅ Yes Statement 3 After you create the suppression rule, a new alert triggered on Device2 is visible in the alerts queue. Device2 belongs to ATP1. The rule hides new alerts in ATP1. Therefore the new alert is hidden. ❌ No

• 1

  Shouldn't this be: Y-Y-Y ? Looking at the suppression scope its only listed for ATP1 which only contains Device 1. Therefore the third question the alerts would NOT be suppressed?

• 1

  scope is not only for all alerts on devices on ATP1 scope so only all alerts on device 1 are suppressed??