Preparing Practice Exam…
Please wait a moment while the system generates the exam questions, answers, and study session.
Please wait a moment while the system generates the exam questions, answers, and study session.
CompTIA Server+ · CompTIA
Select one answer.
Written by other learners. Comments can disagree with the marked answer — check the official documentation when in doubt.
B - Core is the best solution
This is what I found. A core installation, also known as a headless or minimal installation, provides a command-line interface without a graphical user interface (GUI). This approach aligns with the company policy for several reasons: Reduced attack surface: A core installation eliminates unnecessary components and services, minimizing potential vulnerabilities. Remote management: Core installations are typically managed remotely through secure protocols like SSH, eliminating the need for direct local logins. Efficiency: Core installations use fewer system resources, allowing the server to dedicate more power to its primary functions. Compliance: By not having a GUI, it discourages direct logins and encourages proper remote management practices, adhering to the company policy.
A. GUI (Graphical User Interface): Installing the OS through a graphical interface typically requires physically connecting a monitor, keyboard, and mouse to the server. This would involve direct login access, potentially violating the company policy. B. Core: While a core installation might reduce the server's attack surface compared to a full GUI installation, it wouldn't eliminate the need for direct login for configuration. D. Clone: Cloning an existing server creates a copy of the existing system configuration. While potentially faster for initial setup, it wouldn't address the core policy of avoiding direct login to the new server, especially if the cloned server contains unnecessary accounts or security vulnerabilities.