Preparing Practice Exam…
Please wait a moment while the system generates the exam questions, answers, and study session.
Please wait a moment while the system generates the exam questions, answers, and study session.
AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional · AWS
Select one answer.
Written by other learners. Comments can disagree with the marked answer — check the official documentation when in doubt.
Not sure why so much discussion on this. A = No. B. Only makes sense cost wise if HDD was used. C. S3 GDA rules this out. No GIR in use here. D. Only option that makes sense. Key part to understand is that the answer does not specify where the S3 FG will be deployed, the misdirection here is thinking its goes in the DC - FG goes on-site. Easier way to read it: Deploy an Amazon S3 FG 'onsite'. Now I have 2x copies in DC + if DC goes down > direct to AWS via FG.
This is a poorly worded question. I would normally choose D except for this part of the question "The company needs the ability to use SMB to access the data from either the data center or AWS if a disaster occurs." If you use S3 File Gateway it lives on prem and allows the SMB communication. But if a disaster occurs, they won't be able to access the S3 data in AWS using SMB anymore because the File Gateway will be gone. With FSx they would still be able to access the files in AWS using SMB during a disaster.
"The copy of the data is rarely accessed but must be available within 5 minutes." Data is equivalent to metadata, NOT the images. The images can go cold storage.