A company wants to manage the costs associated with a group of 20 applications that are infrequently used, but are still business-critical, by migrating to AWS. The applications are a mix of Java and Node.js spread across different instance clusters. The company wants to minimize costs while standardizing by using a single deployment methodology. Most of the applications are part of month-end processing routines with a small number of concurrent users, but they are occasionally run at other times. Average application memory consumption is less than 1 GB. though some applications use as much as 2.5 GB of memory during peak processing. The most important application in the group is a billing report written in Java that accesses multiple data sources and often runs for several hours. Which is the MOST cost-effective solution?
Select one answer.
Marked answer: C
Community Discussion
Written by other learners. Comments can disagree with the marked answer — check the official documentation when in doubt.
1
option D seems most cost effective solution
1
just B
1
This option provides more control over the infrastructure and can accommodate the varying resource requirements of different applications. By utilizing EC2 Auto Scaling and Application Load Balancers, you can efficiently manage resources based on demand. Purchasing Reserved Instances can provide cost savings over the long term.