SAP-C02 Question 226

Community Discussion

Written by other learners. Comments can disagree with the marked answer — check the official documentation when in doubt.

• Chose A1

  This question is flawed in that Option A is the most closest to meeting all the requirements except that it used SQS instead of DynamoDB for session storage. Every other option requires significant ongoing operational overhead

• Chose A1

  AWS Fargate removes all EC2 instance management, providing the lowest ongoing operational overhead. It’s fully serverless for containers, integrates directly with EFS for shared data, and uses managed, serverless services (EFS, SQS) for persistence. EKS (as in D) still requires node management, Kubernetes configuration, and more operational effort, so it’s not as lightweight as Fargate.

• 1

  I agree but SQS should be replaced with DynamoDB