Preparing Practice Exam…
Please wait a moment while the system generates the exam questions, answers, and study session.
Please wait a moment while the system generates the exam questions, answers, and study session.
AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional · AWS
Select one answer.
Written by other learners. Comments can disagree with the marked answer — check the official documentation when in doubt.
If the question is about creating a migration business case from existing on-prem inventory data (like CMDB exports), the correct tool is Migration Evaluator. Application Discovery Service is more for automated data collection, not cost modeling from an existing inventory file.
This is again another example of completely stupid, nonsensical and useless exposition to ambiguity. Which one is correct because yeah, B seems to be well supported by https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/architecture/accelerating-your-migration-to-aws/ but in the faqs for AWS Application Discovery Service https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/architecture/accelerating-your-migration-to-aws/ there is literally a question about Application Discovery service Q: Can I ingest data into Application Discovery Service from my existing configuration management database (CMDB)? "Yes, you can import information about your on-premises servers and applications into the Migration Hub so you can track the status of application migrations. To import your data, you can download and populate the import CSV template and then upload it using the Migration Hub import console or by invoking the Application Discovery Service APIs" So which one is correct? And what real knowledge are we getting from this pile of shit?
The scenario asks for a cost analysis. Yes, you can import CMDB data into Application Discovery Service but ADS doesn't do cost analysis.