Preparing Practice Exam…
Please wait a moment while the system generates the exam questions, answers, and study session.
Please wait a moment while the system generates the exam questions, answers, and study session.
ISACA Certified in the Governance of Enterprise IT · Isaca
Select one answer.
Written by other learners. Comments can disagree with the marked answer — check the official documentation when in doubt.
Low attendance shows a lot about the governance. Failure to comply might be due to control failure.
It should be B - The strategy committee is a key governance body responsible for overseeing the development and implementation of IT strategy. Low attendance at these meetings may indicate that business leaders do not view IT governance as an important or effective function. This can be a sign that IT governance has a poor reputation and may need to be improved. Regulatory noncompliance (option A) can be a result of poor governance practices, but it is not necessarily a clear indicator of a poor reputation for IT governance. Noncompliance may result from a variety of factors, including inadequate resources, lack of understanding of regulatory requirements, or ineffective controls.
Low attendance at strategy committee meetings is the best indicator that IT governance has a poor reputation in a large enterprise. While regulatory noncompliance (option A), high turnover of IT staff (option C), and data leakage (option D) are also serious issues that may indicate problems within the IT governance framework, they may not directly reflect the reputation of IT governance unless they are directly attributed to governance failures. Low attendance at strategy committee meetings, however, is a more direct and visible sign of dissatisfaction or lack of trust in the governance mechanisms.