A company uses a 1 Gbps AWS Direct Connect connection to connect its AWS environment to its on-premises data center. The connection provides employees with access to an application VPC that is hosted on AWS. Many remote employees use a company-provided VPN to connect to the data center. These employees are reporting slowness when they access the application during business hours. On-premises users have started to report similar slowness while they are in the office. The company plans to build an additional application on AWS. On-site and remote employees will use the additional application. After the deployment of this additional application, the company will need 20% more bandwidth than the company currently uses. With the increased usage, the company wants to add resiliency to the AWS connectivity. A network engineer must review the current implementation and must make improvements within a limited budget. What should the network engineer do to meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?
Select one answer.
Marked answer: B
Community Discussion
Written by other learners. Comments can disagree with the marked answer — check the official documentation when in doubt.
Chose B2
I think the key is "the MOST cost effective" because both B and E will provide bad experience for remote users (maybe B even more since they will have an additional VPN hop). So B should be the right one having cost in mind because with E you also have the additional cost of AWS Client VPN.
Chose B2
split users: remote employees uses s2s et on-prem thru direct connect
Chose A2
D cannot be, 1 to 4Gb is way more than 20%... C is way to expensive, B doesn't add more BW. Cost effective is A. CostEffective means you pay what you get. and you got the 20% doubling with the LAG.
