ANS-C01 Question 198

Community Discussion

Written by other learners. Comments can disagree with the marked answer — check the official documentation when in doubt.

• 1

  B is right Both companies have different AWS accounts, making it impossible for them to directly share a transit gateway. The existing hosted connection is in the us-east-1 Region, while Company B's applications are located in the us-west-2 Region, and they do not overlap with each other. Therefore, using the same transit VIF would not be viable without some sort of shared resource between them.

• 1

  B is right! In Company B's account, create an association proposal to link the transit gateway in us-west-2 to Company A's Direct Connect gateway. In Company A's account, accept the association proposal. Update routing configurations to allow traffic from Company A's on-premises environment to reach Company B's applications via the Direct Connect gateway and transit gateway.

• Chose B4

  Option B is the most efficient solution for connecting Company A’s on-premises environment to Company B’s applications. It leverages the existing Direct Connect infrastructure, minimizing the need for additional hardware and configuration, and uses Direct Connect gateway and transit gateway association for seamless integration between the two companies’ environments.