Preparing Practice Exam…
Please wait a moment while the system generates the exam questions, answers, and study session.
Please wait a moment while the system generates the exam questions, answers, and study session.
Question 29 of 373
Free Preview · 373 of 1,242 · questions 1–373 of 1,242 are free. Sign up free to sync your progress across devices.
Select one answer.
Written by other learners. Comments can disagree with the marked answer — check the official documentation when in doubt.
Why B is correct A risk analysis evaluates the risks associated with a particular asset, considering factors such as threats, vulnerabilities, likelihood, and potential business impact. The results help determine how much protection the asset needs. Why A is a close contender Corporate risk appetite establishes how much risk the organization is willing to accept. It helps guide decisions about whether the residual risk associated with an asset is acceptable. But risk appetite alone doesn't tell you the specific level of protection that asset requires. A. Corporate risk appetite: Defines the amount and type of risk the organization is willing to accept in pursuit of its objectives. B. Risk analysis: Evaluates risk by considering factors such as likelihood and impact, helping determine the appropriate response and level of protection.
Risk appetite = organizational tolerance Risk analysis = evaluation of a specific asset's risk "Deciding the level of protection a PARTICULAR asset should be given..."
Determining the level of protection an asset should receive depends on understanding the risk to that asset i.e., how likely it is to be compromised and how severe the impact would be if it were