Preparing Practice Exam…
Please wait a moment while the system generates the exam questions, answers, and study session.
Please wait a moment while the system generates the exam questions, answers, and study session.
Question 20 of 77
Free Preview · 77 of 256 · questions 1–77 of 256 are free. Sign up free to sync your progress across devices.
Select one answer.
Written by other learners. Comments can disagree with the marked answer — check the official documentation when in doubt.
I would Prefer the option where the agent that detects the gap reports it explicitly (structured output) and the loop runs through to re-verification. “Coordinator infers gaps from free text” is weaker than “agent reports gaps, coordinator acts.” With Option B , the decision making is still with the co-ordinator.
Both B and C describe a feedback loop where gaps trigger targeted searches. The difference is who detects the gaps: - B — The analysis agent reports gaps to the coordinator. The agent is deciding what counts as a gap and flagging it. - C — The coordinator reviews analysis output for gap indicators. The coordinator is making the judgment call. C is better because the coordinator owns quality control. The analysis agent's job is to analyze — the coordinator's job is to evaluate whether the output is sufficient and decide whether to re-delegate. Keeping that decision at the coordinator level maintains clean role separation and gives the coordinator full visibility over the pipeline state.
Answer B. I would Prefer the option where the agent that detects the gap reports it explicitly (structured output) and the loop runs through to re-verification. “Coordinator infers gaps from free text” is weaker than “agent reports gaps, coordinator acts.” co-ordinator makes decisions which is also included in Option B.