Preparing Practice Exam…
Please wait a moment while the system generates the exam questions, answers, and study session.
Please wait a moment while the system generates the exam questions, answers, and study session.
Question 8 of 184
Free Preview · 184 of 613 · questions 1–184 of 613 are free. Sign up free to sync your progress across devices.
Select one answer.
Written by other learners. Comments can disagree with the marked answer — check the official documentation when in doubt.
B is correct
B is correct. Dont know how to explain it well but here it goes. With the ACL you permit the network or host you want. with Route-map it will process the match clause and do what you configured the route-map either permit or deny the route. in the question the route map is permitting the network 192.168.2.2 as its permited to by the permit statement in the ACL. if we change the route-map to deny. It will deny network 192.168.2.2 becuase again its permitted by the ACL to process it and do what the route-map is configured to do which will deny it from showing in the routing table. ACLs are configured with permit to have the networks or hosts to be processed by the route-map. config ip access-list standard 1 permit host 192.168.2.2 (implicit deny any is added at the end of the ACL by default) route-map RM-OSPF-DL deny 10 match ip address 1 this will process 192.168.2.2 due to the (ACL permit) statement and deny it (through the route-map deny) statement while all other traffic is allowed by the (ACL) implicit deny statement hope that makes sense
Tested in lab. Answer A: permit in ACL and permit in route-map - 192.168.2.2 remain in the routing table. Answer B: deny in ACL and permit in route-map will remove 192.168.2.2 from the routing table. Answer C: permit in prefix-list and permit in route-map - 192.168.2.2 remain in the routing table. Answer D: the sequence 10 already let the 192.168.2.2 remain in the routing table.