Implementing Cisco Enterprise Advanced Routing and Services (ENARSI) Practice Mode

Community Discussion

Written by other learners. Comments can disagree with the marked answer — check the official documentation when in doubt.

• 1

  The answer is D NewYork router does not have 10.1.1.0/24 network because there is no static route or advertisement from Cicago router which cause between LA R and NewYork R ping is unreachable. D is a only way to advertise 10.1.1.0/24 route to New York R.

• 5

  For me, it is simply "D". Based on the topology, the networks 192.168.3.0/24 and 192.168.4.0/24 belong to the eigrp domain. Thus, "redistribute connected" under eigrp process is enough to provide connectivity from LA to NY. (I also confirmed it in a lab.)

• 4

  Emulated this in the lab and while eigrp has a redistribute static will advertise the external route to New York router, once the ICMP is sent back to New York from Chicago it is dropped as we don't have a route entry for the 192.168.3.* and 192.168.4.*. It says that with the initial config it works but it don't. There is no point in redistributing connected and no need of adding the static matrics. For me the correct answer is A, if we need the pings to work.