Preparing Practice Exam…
Please wait a moment while the system generates the exam questions, answers, and study session.
Please wait a moment while the system generates the exam questions, answers, and study session.
Question 30 of 184
Free Preview · 184 of 613 · questions 1–184 of 613 are free. Sign up free to sync your progress across devices.
Select one answer.
Written by other learners. Comments can disagree with the marked answer — check the official documentation when in doubt.
The given answer is FOR SURE INCORRECT. In order to meet the feasibility criteria the RD is what is analyzed. RD has to be less than that of the successors FD. So, if the successor's FD is 1,075,200 and the other path has a RD of 281,600, then not even setting the variance at all makes it a feasible successor and eligible to be load balanced, but variance 2 is closer than 4, so I'd go with D.
The correct answer is: A
I do not understand The successor has an FD of 1075200 The feasible successor has an RD of 281600 so the feasibility condition is met ...why should we manipulate the variance? maybe there is a missing zero in the RD of the Feasible successor?